PROBLEM

A log file is not evidence.

When a regulator, an auditor, or a court asks you to show that your AI was governed, "we have controls" is not an answer. You need proof. Dated, traceable, defensible proof that the right tests ran, the right guardrails fired, and the right policy applied to the decision in question.

Most enterprises cannot produce it. Their testing lives in one tool, their monitoring in another, their policy in a document, and their audit trail nowhere in particular. When the request comes in, they scramble to assemble a story after the fact. That is exactly the kind of evidence regulators do not accept.

Prove & Comply is the third layer of AI Assurance. It is the difference between claiming you are compliant and being able to prove it.

CAPABILITIES

Audit trails

A complete, tamper-evident record of what your AI did.

Every test, every guardrail action, every policy decision is captured and timestamped as it happens. When you need to reconstruct how a single output was produced and governed, the trail is already there, not assembled in a panic after the request lands.

This is evidence created at the moment of action, which is the only kind that holds up.

AI compliance dashboards

Your compliance posture, visible at a glance.

See where your AI systems stand against the standards you have to meet, in one place. Track coverage, surface gaps, and know your exposure before someone external points it out. The dashboard turns a pile of technical activity into a clear picture your governance function and your board can actually read.

EU AI Act alignment

Mapped to the regulation that matters most.

The EU AI Act sets real obligations with real enforcement behind them, and the requirements land hardest on high-risk AI systems. Prove & Comply maps your assurance activity to those obligations, including the Article 9 risk-management duties and the Article 72 post-market monitoring requirements, so you can show alignment instead of hoping for the best.

The same evidence aligns to FCA, SEC, and ISO/IEC 42001 expectations, on a platform that is enterprise-ready by default: SOC 2, SSO/SCIM, and RBAC.

Read our EU AI Act guide for what the regulation requires and how to get ahead of it.

Evidence regulators and auditors trust

Proof built for the people who will scrutinise it.

The evidence Disseqt produces is structured for the audience that matters: regulators, auditors, and your own governance function. It is consistent, traceable, and tied directly to the tests and controls that generated it. When the question is "show me," you hand over evidence, not a story.

DIFFERENTIATION

One platform, one source of truth

Audit-ready evidence is impossible to produce when your assurance is scattered across disconnected tools. The proof you need lives in the link between what you tested, what you enforced, and what you can show.

Disseqt is the only unified AI assurance platform covering testing, monitoring, policy, audit, and compliance in one place. Because Prove & Comply sits on the same platform as your testing and your runtime controls, the evidence is generated automatically as you work. Nothing to reconstruct. Nothing to chase across vendors.

You do not have to choose between observability and governance. You get both, and the audit trail to prove it.

HOW IT WORKS

Four steps from AI activity to evidence a regulator accepts.

1. Capture as it happens. Every test, guardrail action, and policy decision is recorded and timestamped at the moment of action, in a tamper-evident trail.

2. Map to the rules. Activity is mapped to the obligations you have to meet, from EU AI Act Articles 9 and 72 to FCA, SEC, and ISO/IEC 42001 expectations.

3. See your posture. Compliance dashboards show where each AI system stands, where the gaps are, and your exposure, in a view your board can read.

4. Hand over the proof. When the request lands, you produce structured, traceable evidence tied to the exact tests and controls that generated it. Nothing reconstructed after the fact.

OBJECTIONS

"We already have a GRC platform." GRC platforms log policies and attestations. They do not hold the technical evidence of what your AI actually tested, blocked, and decided. Prove & Comply generates that evidence automatically, mapped to the regulation, and it lives on the same platform as your testing and enforcement.

"We're too early to need this." The EU AI Act is already in force, and the obligations land hardest on high-risk systems. Capturing evidence from day one costs nothing extra here, because it is generated as you test and enforce. Reconstructing it later, after a request lands, is where enterprises fail.

"Can't we just pull our logs when asked?" A log file is not evidence. Regulators want dated, traceable proof tied to the controls that produced each decision, structured for the people who will scrutinise it. Assembling a story after the request is exactly what they do not accept.

WHO THIS IS FOR

Built for the teams who have to answer when someone asks "prove it."

• Enterprise IT and engineering teams who need to show how a single AI output was governed.

• FCA and SEC-regulated financial services facing audits and examinations with real consequences.

• Global systems integrators and IT consulting partners delivering audit-ready AI for the enterprises they serve.

THE CATEGORY

This is AI Assurance, a new category.

It is not GRC, which records intent but not the technical proof. It is not eval tooling, which tests but never structures evidence for an auditor. AI Assurance sits between the application layer and your enterprise governance function, and Prove & Comply is the layer that turns assurance into proof.

Legacy GRC platforms and point tools cannot produce evidence generated by the tests and controls themselves. Disseqt can, because it is all one platform.

ONE PLATFORM, THREE PILLARS

Prove & Comply is the third pillar in the AI Assurance Lifecycle. It is the layer that proves it.

It depends on the other two. Test & Detect finds the risks before launch. Protect & Enforce stops bad outputs in production. Prove & Comply captures all of it as evidence regulators accept.

One platform. One record. The full lifecycle, from first test to final audit.